{"meta_info": {"format": "json", "meta_format": "AIPMetadata", "meta_format_version": "1", "application": "SEEDSbase", "application_version": "2.0", "package_id": 209, "creation_timestamp_ISO8601": "2017-06-30T08:25:31Z"}, "study_version": {"reference_no": "16", "version_no": "1", "language": "EN", "title": {"EN": "(In)equality in Social Protection: Multi-level Analysis of Intersectionality in Social Assistance Provision- A Comparative Study\r\n\r\n\r\n", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": "(Не) еднаквостите во социјалната заштита: Повеќеслојна анализа на интерсекционалноста при обезбедувањето на социјална заштита - компаративна студија"}, "institutions": [{"name": "European Policy Institute Skopje, ul. Antonie Grubisic 2/2, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia", "letter": "(a)"}, {"name": "Analitika - Center for Social Research, Hamdije Kreševljakovića 50, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina", "letter": "(b)"}], "authors": [{"name": "Biljana Kotevska", "letter": "(a)"}, {"name": "Simonida Kacarska", "letter": "(a)"}, {"name": "Elena Anchevska", "letter": "(a)"}, {"name": "Edin Hodžić", "letter": "(b)"}, {"name": "Mirna Jusić", "letter": "(b)"}, {"name": "Aida Malkić", "letter": "(b)"}], "mandate_institutions": [{"name": "University of Fribourg, Interfaculty Institute for Central and Eastern Europe, Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, Bd de Pérolles 90, 1700 Fribourg", "letter": ""}], "period": {"EN": "2014-2016", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": ""}, "geographical_space": {"EN": "Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": ""}, "abstract": {"EN": "The main objective of the research was to study social need from an intersectional perspective, identifying and mapping out the dynamics and characteristics of power relations as potential sources of inequalities, and to see whether and in what ways these are reconfirmed, perpetuated, and reconstructed, or alleviated and eliminated at the individual, symbolic and structural levels, as well as to study the interactions between these levels. The authors were, then, concerned with the question how social protection policies in Macedonia and BiH address multiple inequalities of persons that are or ought to be users of the social protection system, with a particular focus on the inequalities at the intersections, what impact this has on the livelihood of these persons, and how this can be improved.", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": ""}, "results": {"EN": "Findings from both country confirmed that the systems in both countries are viewed as corrupt, unjust, and that it fails to provide for those that need assistance the most. What was found in both countries was a failure to identify and address inequalities that lie at the intersections. State policies will provide assistance to persons with disabilities. However, as one moves away from the capitals, it seems that the accessibility decreases. Thus, living in a rural area poses additional obstacles for these persons. In addition, in the case of BiH, there is a staggering difference in the amounts of funds provided by social assistance among the three entities. Additional difference highlighted in the case of BiH is in relation to persons who acquired disability during the war and as war veterans and civilians, and all others.\r\nIn both countries persons report burdening, lengthy and complex procedures for acquiring and keeping the social assistance funds. In addition, persons who are either homeless or who have no income whatsoever, but who do not receive social assistance or whose assistance has been discontinued were identified. Neither special services, nor care is extended to persons with disabilities. Children, especially female children seem to be off the State’s radar. No care is taken over their position, the conditions in which they mature, no effort is made to assist parents in their child-rearing activities. Moreover, in some of the cases parents or caretakers went to incredible lengths to protect and bring up their children; yet, not only are they not assisted by the State, but they face additional obstacles. \r\nA predominant single axis approach was identified. In Macedonia there seems to be a stronger equality and non-discrimination legal and policy framework. Its comprehensive equality law includes a provision on multiple discrimination, declaring it an outlawed grave form of discrimination. This is not the case in BiH where, although the draft-law contained such a provision, it was later taken out from the text and the law was adopted without outlawing multiple discrimination. In both countries the social protection laws fail to outlaw intersectional discrimination but also multiple discrimination – in more general terms. On grounds of this, a joint recommendation for both countries is that a study needs to be conducted on possibilities for introducing intersectionality to policy making which would include lessons learned from other national process with well assessed potential for policy transplants’ success or failure.\r\n\r\n", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": ""}, "study_type": [{"code": "INSTITUTIONAL", "label": "Research of the indicated institution(s)"}, {"code": "MANDATED", "label": "Mandated research"}], "financed_by": [{"code": "MANDATING", "label": "Mandating institution"}], "publications": ["Kotevska, Biljana. 2016. The Art of Survival: Intersectionality in Social Protection in Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina - Collection of Working Papers. Skopje: European Policy Institute. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/[EN]The_Art_of_Survival[DTP](1).pdf", "Malkić, Aida; Hadziristić, Tea. 2016. Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Macedonia – Results from an Empirical Inquiry. Analitika. BHS version available at: http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/publikacije/intersekcijske_nejednakosti_u_sistemu_socijalne_pomoci_u_bih.pdf. Online: http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/publikacije/inequality_eng_-_izvjestaj_3003_0.pdf", "Kotevska, Biljana; Anchevska, Elena; Kacarska, Simonida. 2016. The Art of Survival: Intersecting Inequalities in Social Protection in Macedonia – Results from an Empirical Inquiry. Skopje: European Policy Institute. MK version available at: \r\nMK: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Country_paper[MK][DTP].pdf , ISBN: 978-608-4702-22-1. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/Country_paper[EN][DTP].pdf", "Center for Social Research Analitika, . 2016. Social Assistance System In BiH: The Neglected Potential of Active Social Policies. Analitika. BHS version available at: \r\nBHS: http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/publikacije/zanemareni_potencijal_-_brief_web_0.pdf. Online: http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/publikacije/zanemareni_potencijal_-_brief_3003.pdf", "European Policy Institute – Skopje, . 2016. What stands at the crossroads? Inequalities at the Intersections in Social Protection in Macedonia – A User’s Perspective. Skopje: European Policy Institute. MK version available at: \r\nhttp://epi.org.mk/docs/[MK]Policy_Brief[DTP].pdf \r\nAL version available at:\r\nhttp://epi.org.mk/docs/[AL]Policy_Brief[DTP].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/[EN]Policy_Brief[DTP].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.4: How the social protection system should be?. Macedonian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov%20treba%20da%20bide%20sistemot%20na%20socijalna%20zastita[MK].pdf\r\nAlbanian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov%20treba%20da%20bide%20sistemot%20na%20socijalna%20zastita[AL].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov%20treba%20da%20bide%20sistemot%20na%20socijalna%20zastita[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.3: How the social protection system is?. Macedonian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov_e_sistemot[MK].pdf \r\nAlbanian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov_e_sistemot[AL].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/Kakov_e_sistemot[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.2: Coping strategies of persons that are or ought to be users of the social protection system. Macedonian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Strategii_za_spravuvanje[MK].pdf \r\nAlbanian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Strategii_za_spravuvanje[AL].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/Strategii_za_spravuvanje[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.1: Basic needs of persons that are or ought to be users of the social protection system. Macedonian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Osnovni_potrebi[MK].pdf \r\nAlbanian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/Osnovni_potrebi[AL].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/Osnovni_potrebi[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.4: How the social protection system should be?. Bosnian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_How%20the%20system%20should%20be[BHS].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_How%20the%20system%20should%20be[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.3: How the social protection system is?. Bosnian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_How%20the%20system%20is[BHS].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_How%20the%20system%20is[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.2: Coping strategies of persons that are or ought to be users of the social protection system. Bosnian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_Coping_Strategies[BHS].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_Coping_Strategies[EN].pdf", "Regional Research Promotion Programme in the Western Balkans - RRPP, . Infographic No.1: Basic needs of persons that are or ought to be users of the social protection system. Bosnian version: http://epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_Basic%20Needs[BHS].pdf. Online: http://www.epi.org.mk/docs/BiH_Basic%20Needs[EN].pdf"], "unpublished_documents": [], "secondary_analysis": [], "start_date": "2014-08-01", "end_date": "2016-03-15"}, "dataset_version": {"reference_no": "54", "version_no": "1", "language": "EN", "title": {"EN": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus_groups_BiH_BiH", "DE": "", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": ""}, "additional_information": "There are two focus groups on Bosnian language", "general_remarks": "", "publication_date": "", "bibliographical_citation": "", "consent_of_respondents": "True", "data_type": {"code": "QUALITATIVE", "label": "Qualitative data"}, "time_method": {}, "medias": [{"code": "DIGITALIZED-DATA-FILE", "label": "Digitalized data file"}], "data_collector": "", "other_data_collector": "", "available_document_types": "??", "remarks_on_documentation": "", "difficulties_in_documentation": "", "restriction": {"code": "NONE", "label": "None"}, "special_order": "1", "special_permission": {"code": "NONE", "label": "None"}, "data_files": [{"file_origin": "submitted by reasarcher", "reference_no": "655", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH", "remarks": "", "version_notes": "", "analysis_units": [{"code": "GROUP", "label": "Group"}], "universe": "General population where neither the participant nor anyone from their household or extended family is or has been a social assistance recipient", "data_collections": [{"code": "FOCUS-GROUP", "label": "Focus group"}], "instruments": [{"code": "QUESTIONNAIRE", "label": "Questionnaire"}], "data_source": "", "number_of_cases": "None", "number_of_variables": "None", "start_collection_date": "2015-01-15", "end_collection_date": "2015-11-15", "sampling": {"type": {}, "description": "", "response_rate": "", "weighting_information": ""}, "original_data": "True", "data_completeness": "", "link_question_variable": "", "variable_and_value_labels": "", "missing_values_treatment": "", "constructed_variables": "", "contextual_variables": "", "data_is_anonymised": "True", "anonymisation_remark": "", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-SUBMITTED-FILE-655", "name": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "treated by archive", "reference_no": "915", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH", "remarks": "", "version_notes": "", "analysis_units": [{"code": "GROUP", "label": "Group"}], "universe": "General population where neither the participant nor anyone from their household or extended family is or has been a social assistance recipient", "data_collections": [{"code": "FOCUS-GROUP", "label": "Focus group"}], "instruments": [{"code": "QUESTIONNAIRE", "label": "Questionnaire"}], "data_source": "", "number_of_cases": "None", "number_of_variables": "None", "start_collection_date": "2015-01-15", "end_collection_date": "2015-11-15", "sampling": {"type": {}, "description": "", "response_rate": "", "weighting_information": ""}, "original_data": "True", "data_completeness": "", "link_question_variable": "", "variable_and_value_labels": "", "missing_values_treatment": "", "constructed_variables": "", "contextual_variables": "", "data_is_anonymised": "True", "anonymisation_remark": "", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-TREATED-FILE-915", "name": "54_InequalitySocialProtection_Data_Focus Group_1_BH.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "submitted by reasarcher", "reference_no": "656", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_2_transcript_BiH_BiH", "remarks": "This is one of the two focus groups in Bosnian language", "version_notes": "", "analysis_units": [{"code": "GROUP", "label": "Group"}], "universe": "General population where neither the participant nor anyone from their household or extended family is or has been a social assistance recipient", "data_collections": [{"code": "FOCUS-GROUP", "label": "Focus group"}], "instruments": [{"code": "QUESTIONNAIRE", "label": "Questionnaire"}], "data_source": "", "number_of_cases": "None", "number_of_variables": "None", "start_collection_date": "2015-01-15", "end_collection_date": "2015-11-15", "sampling": {"type": {}, "description": "", "response_rate": "", "weighting_information": ""}, "original_data": "True", "data_completeness": "", "link_question_variable": "", "variable_and_value_labels": "", "missing_values_treatment": "", "constructed_variables": "", "contextual_variables": "", "data_is_anonymised": "True", "anonymisation_remark": "", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-SUBMITTED-FILE-656", "name": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_2_transcript_BiH_BiH.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "treated by archive", "reference_no": "916", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_2_transcript_BiH_BiH", "remarks": "This is one of the two focus groups in Bosnian language", "version_notes": "", "analysis_units": [{"code": "GROUP", "label": "Group"}], "universe": "General population where neither the participant nor anyone from their household or extended family is or has been a social assistance recipient", "data_collections": [{"code": "FOCUS-GROUP", "label": "Focus group"}], "instruments": [{"code": "QUESTIONNAIRE", "label": "Questionnaire"}], "data_source": "", "number_of_cases": "None", "number_of_variables": "None", "start_collection_date": "2015-01-15", "end_collection_date": "2015-11-15", "sampling": {"type": {}, "description": "", "response_rate": "", "weighting_information": ""}, "original_data": "True", "data_completeness": "", "link_question_variable": "", "variable_and_value_labels": "", "missing_values_treatment": "", "constructed_variables": "", "contextual_variables": "", "data_is_anonymised": "True", "anonymisation_remark": "", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-TREATED-FILE-916", "name": "54_InequalitySocialProtection_Data_Focus Group_2_BH.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}], "documents": [{"file_origin": "submitted by reasarcher", "reference_no": "652", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group guide", "remarks": "Semi structured questionnaire", "version_notes": "", "documentation_type": {"code": "COLLECTION-INSTRUMENTS", "label": "Collection instruments"}, "origin_documentation": {"code": "RESEARCHER", "label": "Researcher"}, "part_of_general_documentation": "False", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-SUBMITTED-FILE-652", "name": "DC_Tool_Focus_group_guide.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "treated by archive", "reference_no": "912", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group guide", "remarks": "Semi structured questionnaire", "version_notes": "", "documentation_type": {"code": "COLLECTION-INSTRUMENTS", "label": "Collection instruments"}, "origin_documentation": {"code": "RESEARCHER", "label": "Researcher"}, "part_of_general_documentation": "False", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-TREATED-FILE-912", "name": "54_InequalitySocialProtection_Doc_Focus Group_Guide_EN.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "treated by archive", "reference_no": "913", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH_Codebook", "remarks": "", "version_notes": "", "documentation_type": {"code": "CODING-INSTRUCTIONS", "label": "Coding instructions"}, "origin_documentation": {"code": "RESEARCHER", "label": "Researcher"}, "part_of_general_documentation": "False", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-TREATED-FILE-913", "name": "54_InequalitySocialProtection_Doc_Anonymization Key_BH.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "submitted by reasarcher", "reference_no": "654", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH_Codebook_Explanation", "remarks": "", "version_notes": "", "documentation_type": {"code": "CODING-INSTRUCTIONS", "label": "Coding instructions"}, "origin_documentation": {"code": "RESEARCHER", "label": "Researcher"}, "part_of_general_documentation": "False", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-SUBMITTED-FILE-654", "name": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH_Codebook_Explanation.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}, {"file_origin": "treated by archive", "reference_no": "914", "file_version": "1", "title": "51_(In)equality in Social Protection_Focus group_1_transcript_BiH_BiH_Codebook_Explanation", "remarks": "", "version_notes": "", "documentation_type": {"code": "CODING-INSTRUCTIONS", "label": "Coding instructions"}, "origin_documentation": {"code": "RESEARCHER", "label": "Researcher"}, "part_of_general_documentation": "False", "physical_files": {"datastream_key": "FB-TREATED-FILE-914", "name": "54_InequalitySocialProtection_Doc_Anonymization Key_Translations_BH_EN.rtf", "format": "application/msword"}}], "deposit_contract": {"reference_no": "10678", "accepted_date": "2017-06-01", "accepted_by": "Researcher ISPJR SEEDS", "title": {"EN": "Deposit contract FORS", "DE": "Hinterlegungsvertrag FORS", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": "Contrat de dépôt FORS"}, "text": {"EN": "1. The institution depositing the data, <>\r\n\r\nRepresented by <>\r\na) maintains the copyright on the data in point 2 as well as on the corresponding documentation,\r\nb) has collected and treated the data in conformity with existing laws on data protection,\r\nc) confirms that the data have been anonymised, and\r\nd) deposits them at FORS, Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. The data to be archived\r\n\r\nData and documentation from the project entitled <>, under the direction of <>.\r\n\r\n\r\n3. The goal of the archiving of the data\r\n\r\nThe deposit of the data and documentation at FORS has the aim of:\r\na) their archiving at FORS,\r\nb) their reuse by third parties for the purpose of analysis.\r\n\r\n\r\n4. Responsibilities of FORS\r\n\r\nFORS agrees to:\r\na) archive the data and the documentation in accordance with its possibilities and technical standards,\r\nb) make the data and documentation available to third parties for analytic purposes,\r\nc) inform data users of their contractual and legal obligations, which are notably:\r\n- to respect the Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) of 19 June 1992, if they use individual data,\r\n- to cite completely the data source, the institution, and the researchers that produced the data,\r\n- to use the data and instruments only for their own analytical purposes. In particular, it is not permissible to transmit the data to third parties, whether in original or modified form, whether for reward or free of charge.\r\n\r\nFORS is however not responsible for possible violations of these terms by data users.\r\n\r\n\r\n5. Rights of FORS\r\n\r\na) FORS has the right to publish information on the data and the corresponding research project in order to inform about the archived data and to promote their reuse,\r\nb) FORS has the right to provide to third parties, for analytic purposes, copies of the archived data and the corresponding documentation,\r\nc) FORS has the right to use the archived data for analytic and to publish results.\r\n\r\n\r\n6. Rights of the institutions that deposits the data\r\n\r\nThe institution has the right to be informed about any reuse of the data by third parties.", "DE": "1. Die übergebende Institution <>\r\n\r\nvertreten durch <>\r\na) sind im Besitze der Autorenrechte an den unter Ziff. 2 genannten Daten inkl. der dazugehörenden Forschungsdokumentation,\r\nb) haben diese Daten gemäss geltenden Datenschutzbestimmungen erhoben und bearbeitet,\r\nc) bestätigen, dass die zu archivierenden Daten anonymisiert sind und\r\nd) übergeben diese an FORS, Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. Die zu archivierenden Daten\r\n\r\nDatensatz und Dokumentation zum Projekt <>, durchgeführt unter der Leitung von <>.\r\n\r\n\r\n3. Zweck der Archivierung:\r\n\r\nDer Daten- und Dokumentationstransfer erfolgt zum Zwecke\r\na) der Archivierung bei FORS,\r\nb) der Wiederverwendung der Daten durch Dritte im Rahmen von Sekundäranalysen.\r\n\r\n\r\n4. Pflichten von FORS\r\n\r\nFORS verpflichtet sich\r\na) zur Archivierung der Daten im Rahmen seiner technischen Möglichkeiten und Standards,\r\nb) zur Bereitstellung der Daten für die Sekundärforschung,\r\nc) zur Information der Datennutzer über deren vertragliche und rechtliche Pflichten insbesondere\r\n- das Bundesgesetz über den Datenschutz (vom 19.Juni 1992) bei der Bearbeitung von Individualdaten zu beachten,\r\n- die Datenquelle, die Institutionen und die Forschenden, welche die Daten produziert haben, vollständig zu zitieren,\r\n- die zur Verfügung gestellten Daten und Instrumente zur Datenerhebung nur für eigene Auswertungen zu verwenden und sie insbesondere nicht in identischer oder bearbeiteter Form entgeltlich oder unentgeltlich an Dritte weiterzugeben.\r\n\r\nFORS ist jedoch nicht verantwortlich für allfällige Rechtsverletzungen durch Datenbezüger.\r\n\r\n\r\n5. Rechte von FORS\r\n\r\na) FORS darf Informationen über die Daten und das zugrundeliegende Projekt veröffentlichen, zum Zwecke der Information über die archivierten Daten und zur Förderung der Sekundärforschung.\r\nb) FORS darf Kopien der archivierten Daten und der dazugehörenden Dokumentation an Dritte abgeben zum Zwecke der Sekundärforschung.\r\nc) FORS darf die archivierten Daten selbst analysieren und die Ergebnisse veröffentlichen.\r\n\r\n\r\n6. Rechte der übergebenden Institution\r\n\r\nDie Institution hat ein Recht auf Information über die Verwendung der archivierten Daten durch Dritte.", "BS": "", "HR": "", "IT": "", "CG": "", "FR": "1. L'institution qui dépose les données <>\r\n\r\nReprésenté(e) par <>\r\na) détient les droits d'auteur sur les données citées au point 2 ainsi que sur la documentation de recherche qui s'y rapporte,\r\nb) a recueilli et traité ces données en conformité avec la législation en vigueur sur la protection des données,\r\nc) confirme que ces données ont été anonymisées et\r\nd) les dépose à FORS, Université de Lausanne, Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. Les données à archiver\r\n\r\nJeu de données et documentation issus du projet intitulé <> sous la direction de <>\r\n\r\n\r\n3. But de l'archivage\r\n\r\nLe dépôt des données et de la documentation à FORS a pour but\r\na) leur archivage à FORS,\r\nb) leur réutilisation par des tiers à des fins d'analyse.\r\n\r\n\r\n4. Devoirs de FORS\r\n\r\nFORS s'engage à:\r\na) archiver les données et la documentation selon ses possibilités et standards techniques,\r\nb) mettre les données à disposition à des fins d'analyse,\r\nc) informer les utilisateurs des données de leurs obligations contractuelles et légales, qui sont notamment de\r\n- respecter la loi fédérale sur la protection des données du 19.6.1992, s'ils exploitent des données individuelles,\r\n- de citer complètement la source des données, l'institution et les chercheurs qui les ont produites,\r\n- de n'utiliser les données et les instruments de collecte mis à disposition que pour les propres exploitations; il est en particulier interdit de transmettre les données à des tiers, que ce soit dans leur forme originale ou sous une forme modifiée, gratuitement ou contre rétribution.\r\n\r\nFORS n'est cependant pas responsable des infractions éventuellement commises par les utilisateurs des données.\r\n\r\n\r\n5. Droits de FORS\r\n\r\na) FORS a le droit de publier des informations sur les données et la recherche dont elles sont issues, afin d'informer sur les données archivées et de promouvoir leur réutilisation,\r\nb) FORS a le droit de remettre à des tiers, à fins d'analyse, des copies des données archivées et de la documentation qui s'y rapporte,\r\nc) FORS a le droit d'exploiter les données archivées et de publier les résultats.\r\n\r\n\r\n6. Droits de l'institution qui dépose les données\r\n\r\nL'institution a le droit d'être informée de la réutilisation par des tiers des données archivées."}}}}